Bahamas on front line for sea-level changes

Bahamas on front line for sea-level changes

Photo by Juan Aguirre Saravia on Unsplash

Originally published 28 March 2000

EXUMA, Bahamas — One can be for­giv­en for being ner­vous about glob­al warm­ing if vir­tu­al­ly your entire coun­try lies only a few feet above sea lev­el. As ocean water warms, it expands, and sea lev­el ris­es. Also, a warm­ing cli­mate melts con­ti­nen­tal ice, fur­ther increas­ing the vol­ume of the sea.

Recent­ly, the Gov­er­nor Gen­er­al of the Bahamas, Sir Orville Turn­quest, said of glob­al warm­ing and ris­ing sea lev­els: “If…we don’t pro­tect the envi­ron­ment and stop this process, the Bahamas will disappear.”

The US Envi­ron­men­tal Pro­tec­tion Agency has pre­dict­ed that sea lev­el will rise about a foot by the end of the cen­tu­ry. That’s a “best guess.” More extreme pre­dic­tions range up to 3 feet. A 3‑foot rise in the sea would put a good part of the Bahamas under­wa­ter, and make the rest vul­ner­a­ble to hur­ri­cane surges.

The ques­tion: Is glob­al warm­ing real?

Nat­u­ral­ly, there are naysay­ers. Accord­ing to the Nas­sau Tri­bune, Lau­ra Jones, direc­tor of Envi­ron­men­tal Stud­ies at the Fras­er Insti­tute in Van­cou­ver, B.C., recent­ly cau­tioned Bahami­ans about get­ting too worked up about ris­ing sea lev­els. Dis­cus­sions of glob­al warm­ing have been “very alarmist,” she report­ed­ly told an envi­ron­men­tal forum in Nas­sau. “We need to sit down and take a close look at the sci­en­tif­ic evi­dence before we start to pur­sue poli­cies that…are going to be very, very costly.”

The Fras­er Insti­tute is an eco­nom­ic think tank that adver­tis­es its mis­sion as “Com­pet­i­tive Mar­ket Solu­tions for Pub­lic Pol­i­cy Prob­lems.” While one day there may be com­pet­i­tive mar­ket solu­tions to com­bat glob­al warm­ing, for now it is a pub­lic pol­i­cy hot potato.

Most cli­ma­tol­o­gists are con­vinced that the trend of ris­ing tem­per­a­tures is real, although there is no firm con­sen­sus even among sci­en­tists as to what the long-range effects will be on weath­er and sea level.

But oppos­ing them is a pooh-poohing alliance of con­ser­v­a­tive media, politi­cians, and cor­po­rate interests.

A stick­ing point in the debate has been a dis­crep­an­cy between ground-based tem­per­a­ture mea­sure­ments, which show a ris­ing trend, and satel­lite mea­sure­ments of the tem­per­a­ture of the upper atmos­phere, which show no change.

A pan­el of the US Nation­al Research Coun­cil recent­ly decid­ed that sur­face and upper atmos­phere tem­per­a­tures are not strong­ly linked, and that the appar­ent dis­crep­an­cy between them does not inval­i­date the ground-based mea­sure­ments. The pan­el con­clud­ed that an increase in glob­al mean sur­face tem­per­a­ture over the past 20 years “is undoubt­ed­ly real and is sub­stan­tial­ly greater than the aver­age rate of warm­ing dur­ing the 20th century.”

Accord­ing to a report in Nature: “The pan­el includes researchers who in the past have argued that the lack of evi­dence for warm­ing from data gath­ered by satel­lite-based equip­ment cast doubt on glob­al warm­ing. Its unan­i­mous con­clu­sion there­fore seems to refute one of the main argu­ments of oppo­nents to the intro­duc­tion in the Unit­ed States of com­pul­so­ry mea­sures [to slow glob­al warming].”

The squab­bles between cli­ma­tol­o­gists and politi­cians are of lit­tle com­fort to peo­ple who live on islands that bare­ly rise above the waves. When Hur­ri­cane Lily blew across this island a few years ago, lots of folks found fish on their front porch­es. If sea lev­el ris­es by a few feet, the fish will be swim­ming in the front door.

In fact, these islands would­n’t be here at all if it weren’t for ups and downs of the sea caused by the Ice Ages. Dur­ing the last inter­glacial peri­od, sea lev­el was about 15 feet high­er than now, and the Bahamas were reduced to a few ridge tops. Dur­ing glacial peri­ods, when the sea was hun­dreds of feet low­er, most of the broad Bahama Bank was high and dry, and winds blew up the dunes that pro­vide the back­bones of the present islands.

Bahami­ans learn this geo­log­i­cal his­to­ry in school, so they know what sea-lev­el change is all about. The gov­ern­ment appears to be opt­ing for an offi­cial pol­i­cy of pru­den­tial plan­ning, but I sus­pect that imme­di­ate eco­nom­ic gain, rather than pru­dence, will guide action in such things as shore development.

And who will blame them? A typ­i­cal Bahami­an politi­cian would prob­a­bly say, “As long as the US Con­gress con­tin­ues to oppose most actions or incen­tives aimed at reduc­ing green­house emis­sions, why should we make eco­nom­ic sac­ri­fices? If glob­al warm­ing is real, as the sci­en­tists insist, it is not nations such as the Bahamas that have caused the problem.”

But if the sci­en­tists are right, the Bahamas will be one of the first places to suf­fer the con­se­quences. There is only a sin­gle speck of land in the entire nation that ris­es as high as Dis­ney World’s Space Mountain.

Share this Musing: