Debauched on light

Debauched on light

Photo by Jared Erondu on Unsplash

Originally published 12 June 1995

Some­how, I’m always late get­ting around to read­ing the real­ly deli­cious books.

Diane Ack­er­man’s A Nat­ur­al His­to­ry of the Sens­es has been lying on the floor by my bed on and off for four years, exud­ing a lus­cious transsen­su­al entice­ment, beg­ging to be read. I resist­ed, know­ing that like rich choco­late or creamy cheese­cake, Ack­er­man’s prose was a treat I would appre­ci­ate the more for hav­ing resisted.

This is a book so engorged with del­i­ca­cies that it must be read in cours­es, per­haps with a bit of plain­er lan­guage in between to clear the palate, a burst­ing cor­nu­copia of sci­ence and poet­ry that left me exhaust­ed by its exuberance.

Per­cep­tion, writes Ack­er­man, is a form of grace. In Catholic the­ol­o­gy, one must be dis­posed to grace to receive it; Ack­er­man is clear­ly well dis­posed. Smell, taste, touch, hear­ing, and vision: these are the five win­dows to her world, thrown open, uncur­tained, in all weathers.

Life show­ers over every­thing,” she writes, “radi­ant, gushing.”

Each of us has a pre­mier sense, a win­dow larg­er than the oth­ers. For me it is vision. Not larg­er in phys­i­cal size (the tac­tile organ, the skin, is a thou­sand times more expan­sive than the reti­nas of the eyes), but larg­er in the excite­ments evoked by faint stim­u­lus. Acute sen­sa­tion is not a mere num­ber­ing of recep­tor cells; it is an elec­tri­cal and chem­i­cal pan­de­mo­ni­um in the brain, out of which the brain some­how con­structs that most remark­able of things, a self.

Which brings up anoth­er book I have recent­ly read, less wel­com­ing than Ack­er­man’s award-win­ning vol­ume but as inter­est­ing in its own way: Mar­cel Min­naert’s Light and Col­or in the Outdoors.

Min­naert (1893 – 1970) was a Dutch astronomer who rev­eled in the mag­ic of vision. His book first appeared in Eng­lish in 1940; a new trans­la­tion was pre­pared in 1993 to com­mem­o­rate the cen­ten­ni­al of the author’s birth. It is a com­pendi­um of tricks of light and col­or in the nat­ur­al world. For each lumi­nous effect the author gives a sci­en­tif­ic explanation.

Until I read Min­naert, I had thought of myself as some­thing of a con­nois­seur of light and col­or. I had trained my col­or vision on the almost imper­cep­ti­ble hues of stars. I had wit­nessed a dozen kinds of rain­bows. Glo­ries, sun dogs, the zodi­a­cal light, mirages, moon bows, noc­tilu­cent clouds — I had seen them all. But Min­naert cat­a­logs a feast of lights such as I hard­ly knew existed.

A few years ago, I watched a thou­sand annu­lar eclipses of the sun pro­ject­ed onto the pave­ment under a tree by a thou­sand pin­hole gaps among the leaves. It was an aston­ish­ing spec­ta­cle. Eclipses scat­tered like bright coins for the pick­ing. This is Min­naert’s phe­nom­e­non No. 1, for which he pro­vides a sat­is­fy­ing geo­met­ri­cal dis­cus­sion, and lists the bet­ter trees under which to seek these solar riches.

I have looked a hun­dred times with binoc­u­lars at the dou­ble star in the han­dle of the Big Dip­per, but nev­er noticed a curi­ous oscil­lat­ing effect described by Min­naert, which occurs as the binoc­u­lars are moved, as if the fainter of the two stars were attached to the brighter by a rub­ber band. This phe­nom­e­non, it turns out, pro­vides a way to observe the time it takes for light to stim­u­late the reti­na of the eye, some­thing we gen­er­al­ly assume to be instantaneous.

Once, in Alas­ka, I wit­nessed a beau­ti­ful cir­cum­zenithal arc, a kind of wrong-way “rain­bow” caused by flat ice crys­tals float­ing in the upper atmos­phere. I count­ed it as a once-in-a-life­time thrill. Min­naert describes more than a dozen kinds of solar arcs and bows, usu­al­ly seen in ones or twos, but occa­sion­al­ly all togeth­er in a spec­tac­u­lar, sky-fill­ing display.

Min­naert treats the col­ors of sea, sky, lakes, water­falls, and pud­dles along the road. And treats they are: graces, rev­e­la­tions, great gusts of visu­al beau­ty blow­ing in the win­dows of the brain.

Ack­er­man says of vision: “To taste or touch your ene­my or your food, you have to be unnerv­ing­ly close to it. To smell or hear it, you can risk being fur­ther off. But vision can rush through the fields and up the moun­tains, trav­el across time, coun­try, and par­secs of out­er space, and col­lect bushel bas­kets of infor­ma­tion as it goes.”

Min­naert’s book is a many-busheled silo of infor­ma­tion, gath­ered by a superbly trained eye from near and far. It makes me want to rush out­side and debauch myself on col­or and light.

Of scents, sounds, fla­vors, touch­es, and sights we con­struct our selves. It is a life­time project, using the five sens­es to dis­tin­guish our­selves from the buzzing, bloom­ing con­fu­sion of the world, until we are able to say with con­fi­dence, “This is me.” From lit­tle bits of the per­ceived world, sift­ed and sort­ed by the brain, we define a bound­ary between “me” and “the rest.”

It is a leaky bound­ary, thank God, pricked with five sens­es, per­me­able to phys­i­cal sen­sa­tion and to won­der, allow­ing the soul to flow in and out from world to self and back again.

Share this Musing: