New stars that reshaped our view of the universe

New stars that reshaped our view of the universe

Remnant of Kepler's Supernova (SN 1604) • NASA/ESA/JHU/R.Sankrit & W.Blair (Public Domain)

Originally published 6 April 1987

A poet of Shake­speare’s time was apt to say that his love (for his lover) was not “sub­lu­nar.” He meant that his love was like the stars — con­stant and unchanging.

Accord­ing to the phi­los­o­phy that had pre­vailed since the time of the Greeks, change occurred only below the moon, in this “sub­lu­nar” world of jum­bled ele­ments and uncon­stant emo­tions. By con­trast, the realm of the stars was immutable. The stars, like the poet­’s love, were fixed and eternal.

And then, to the con­ster­na­tion of poets and philoso­phers, in the win­ter of 1572 a new star blazed out in the con­stel­la­tion Cas­siopeia. The star was well-placed for view­ing, high over­head in the evening sky. It was brighter than all oth­er stars in the sky, bright enough to be seen in broad day­light. All Europe was agog.

But was this new star real­ly above the moon, in which case the philoso­phers were wrong and the heav­ens do change? Or was the “star” in Cas­siopeia not a star at all, but some sort of lumi­nous object in the Earth­’s own atmos­phere? There was one man in Europe emi­nent­ly suit­ed to answer the ques­tion — the well-born, brash and gift­ed Dane, Tycho Brahe.

On the evening of Nov. 11, 1572, Tycho was walk­ing home to sup­per when he hap­pened to glance up at the stars above his head. He saw the new star at once, the nova stel­la. Afraid to believe his own sens­es, he asked ser­vants and neigh­bors to look into the sky and describe what they saw. They con­firmed his obser­va­tion. The star was real.

Philosophers in error

Tycho was a tal­ent­ed astronomer, and had recent­ly built a fine new instru­ment for deter­min­ing the posi­tions of stars. Care­ful­ly, he mea­sured the dis­tance of the new star from the stars of Cas­siopeia. He con­tin­ued these obser­va­tions at dif­fer­ent times of the night, and through­out the win­ter as the star slow­ly fad­ed. And he col­lect­ed posi­tions of the star from oth­er Euro­pean observers. He was try­ing to deter­mine the star’s parallax.

Par­al­lax is the appar­ent change in the posi­tion of an object when viewed from two dif­fer­ent places. To observe par­al­lax, hold your fin­ger in front of your nose and look at it first with one eye and then with the oth­er. Notice how your fin­ger seems to move against the back­ground. Now extend you arm, mov­ing your fin­ger fur­ther away, and note how the par­al­lax lessens. The object in Cas­siopeia did not move at all against the back­ground of the stars when viewed from dif­fer­ent posi­tions. From this obser­va­tion Tycho could read­i­ly cal­cu­late that the new star was sit­u­at­ed in the high­est heav­en, far beyond the moon. The philoso­phers were wrong; the heav­ens do change.

We now know that the new star of 1572 was a super­no­va, the cat­a­stroph­ic explo­sion of a star too far away to have been vis­i­ble before the det­o­na­tion. The super­no­va of 1572 occurred at a cru­cial time in the his­to­ry of astron­o­my. Thir­ty years ear­li­er Coper­ni­cus had bold­ly sug­gest­ed that the sun, not the Earth, was the cen­ter of the uni­verse. Forty years lat­er Galileo, with the aid of the first astro­nom­i­cal tele­scope, would force a reluc­tant world to con­cede that Coper­ni­cus was right. The super­no­va of 1572 changed the sup­pos­ed­ly unchange­able sky, and helped tip the scales in favor of a brave new world.

And if one super­no­va was not enough, in 1604 anoth­er bril­liant star appeared in the con­stel­la­tion Ophi­uchus, only a few degrees away from a rare con­junc­tion of the plan­ets Mars, Jupiter, and Sat­urn. That a new star should join an already remark­able gath­er­ing of plan­ets was omi­nous. The star in Ophi­uchus was on every­one’s lips: Did it fore­tell the over­throw of the Turk­ish empire? A new Euro­pean monarch? The Day of Judgment?

Once more, the heavens change

On Oct. 10 the new star was brought to the atten­tion of Johannes Kepler, Math­e­mati­cian to the Emper­or Rudolph in Prague. If Tycho Bra­he was the great­est obser­va­tion­al astronomer of his time, Kepler was the great­est the­o­ret­i­cal astronomer. He fol­lowed the rise and decline in the bright­ness of the star over many months, and col­lect­ed data from oth­er observers. He con­clu­sive­ly demon­strat­ed the absence of par­al­lax, and there­fore the celes­tial dis­tance of the star. Once again, the “immutable” heav­ens of the philoso­phers had changed.

Both Tycho and Kepler pub­lished books on the new stars, adding to the grow­ing debate on the true arrange­ment of the uni­verse. A few years lat­er Galileo turned his tele­scope upon the heav­ens and dis­cov­ered things that no book­ish philoso­pher had dreamed of — spots on the sun, craters on the moon, the satel­lites of Jupiter, the rings of Sat­urn, the phas­es of Venus, and stars appar­ent­ly with­out num­ber. Mod­ern astron­o­my was born.

Before 1572, no bright super­no­va had appeared in Earth­’s sky for 400 years. The super­no­va of 1604 would be the last until Feb­ru­ary of 1987. In the 32 years that sep­a­rat­ed the two new stars of the Renais­sance, the uni­verse above the moon (and below it) was changed forever.

Share this Musing: