The ancients’ forgotten think tank

The ancients’ forgotten think tank

Tropic of Cancer, Little Exuma, Bahamas • Photo by Venture Minimalists (CC BY 2.0)

Originally published 29 January 1996

Just back from a sun­ny sojourn on the Trop­ic of Can­cer. Not far along the beach from where I was stay­ing is a con­crete slab with “23° 26′ 22.07″ North of the Equa­tor” in big let­ters. On mid­sum­mer day at noon, the sun stands at the zenith, burn­ing a hole in the top of your head. This is the far­thest north the sun ever gets in the sky.

At that time the sun is in the con­stel­la­tion Can­cer as seen against the invis­i­ble back­ground stars. Or rather, the sun was in the con­stel­la­tion Can­cer thou­sands of years ago when astronomers fig­ured all of this out. Today, the mid­sum­mer sun is in the con­stel­la­tion Tau­rus; it has slipped west­ward among the stars because of a slow wob­ble of the Earth­’s axis. We should now prop­er­ly speak of the Trop­ic of Taurus.

Like­wise, the Trop­ic of Capri­corn, mark­ing the sun’s far­thest south­ward excur­sion, should now be called the Trop­ic of Sagit­tar­ius. How­ev­er, in these days of elec­tric lights, air con­di­tion­ing, and satel­lite nav­i­ga­tion, no one pays much atten­tion to the sun and stars, any­way. So let the names of the trop­ics remain as they were 2,300 years ago when sci­ence was invented.

And what an inven­tion! A new way of think­ing, involv­ing quan­ti­ta­tive obser­va­tions and math­e­mat­i­cal deduc­tion, that gave West­ern cul­ture an unpar­al­leled pow­er over nature. Elec­tric lights, air con­di­tion­ing, and satel­lite nav­i­ga­tion, like all oth­er mod­ern tech­nolo­gies, flowed like a riv­er from this pow­er­ful new way of mak­ing sense of the world.

The ideas sprang from Greek phi­los­o­phy. They found a wel­com­ing home in the Hel­lenis­tic city of Alexan­dria at the mouth of the Nile Riv­er in Egypt. In the 3rd and 2nd cen­turies B.C., Alexan­dria became the seat of a mag­nif­i­cent flow­er­ing of math­e­mat­i­cal and sci­en­tif­ic thought. Euclid, Apol­lo­nius, Archimedes, Eratos­thenes, Aristarchus and many oth­ers worked or stud­ied in Alexandria.

It was in Alexan­dria, for exam­ple, that geog­ra­phy and astron­o­my were made math­e­mat­i­cal sci­ences. The equa­tor, poles, polar cir­cles, and trop­ics were deduced, although the only one of these places of which the Alexan­dri­ans had direct knowl­edge was the Trop­ic of Can­cer, which passed through the town of Syene in the val­ley of the Nile, near the site of the present Aswan High Dam.

Lat­i­tude and lon­gi­tude were invent­ed. Eratos­thenes mea­sured the size of the Earth with a com­bi­na­tion of celes­tial and ter­res­tri­al obser­va­tions. Per­haps the great­est achieve­ment of Alexan­dri­an sci­ence is Aristarchus’ book, On the Sizes and Dis­tances of the Sun and the Moon, a work of skill­ful obser­va­tion and flaw­less log­ic that com­pares favor­ably with any­thing in mod­ern science.

These spec­tac­u­lar achieve­ments get no more than pass­ing men­tion in text­books of West­ern Civ­i­liza­tion, in spite of the fact the Alexan­dri­an inven­tion of sci­ence prob­a­bly had more effect on mod­ern life than any oth­er lega­cy of antiq­ui­ty. We learn in school about the Gold­en Age of Greece and the glo­ry that was Rome, Sopho­cles and Ovid, the Parthenon and the Pan­theon, triremes and aque­ducts, but lit­tle or noth­ing of the inven­tion of sci­ence that took place in the white city at the mouth of the Nile. West­ern civ­i­liza­tion, as rep­re­sent­ed by our text­books, passed Alexan­dria by.

It is true that what hap­pened in Alexan­dria had lit­tle effect on the ancient world. The sci­en­tists and math­e­mati­cians who worked there talked most­ly among them­selves. Alexan­dria was a sort of pri­vate think tank, a pres­sure cook­er where the tem­per­a­ture of human thought was raised to a new lev­el. More than a thou­sand years would pass before the new way of think­ing took firm root and trans­formed civilization.

I was think­ing about these things the oth­er night under an inky dark trop­ic sky. In the west, Mer­cury, Venus, and Sat­urn were strung along the zodi­ac like clothes­pins on a line. To the unin­formed eye they are indis­tin­guish­able from stars; to the Alexan­dri­ans, they were wan­der­ing stars whose posi­tions were mea­sured to a frac­tion of a degree and whose motions were giv­en pre­cise math­e­mat­i­cal expression.

Lat­er that night, after mid­night, the con­stel­la­tion Can­cer passed over­head. Can­cer is an incon­spic­u­ous con­stel­la­tion, with no bright stars, invent­ed to mark the sun’s appar­ent path among the stars. At the cen­ter of the con­stel­la­tion is a blur of light, near were the sun would have been on mid­sum­mer day in ancient Alexandria.

The ancients called this blur Prae­sepe, or “manger.” The two faint near­by stars are the “don­keys” eat­ing from the manger. We now know that the blur is a clus­ter of hun­dreds of stars, too faint to be dis­tin­guished by the unaid­ed eye. For those of us who live near cities, the blur has long been made invis­i­ble by arti­fi­cial light and haze.

On the Trop­ic of Can­cer, far from city lights, the Prae­sepe was eas­i­ly vis­i­ble exact­ly at the zenith, as the Alexan­dri­ans might have seen it if they had trav­eled a ways down the Nile. As I watched, I won­dered admir­ing­ly at those bril­liant­ly cre­ative sci­en­tists and math­e­mati­cians who first imposed a net of abstract thought upon the Earth and sky.

Share this Musing: