The chemical element’s the thing

The chemical element’s the thing

Silicon • Image by Th. Voekler (CC BY-SA 3.0)

Originally published 27 September 1999

Some are born great, some achieve great­ness, and some have great­ness thrust upon ’em,” says Shake­speare’s Malvo­lio, read­ing from Mari­a’s letter.

One might apply these words to the ele­ments of which the world is made.

Oxy­gen is born great. Forged in the hot inte­ri­or of stars, oxy­gen has from the first moment of its birth a promis­cu­ous ten­den­cy to com­bine with oth­er atoms. This appetite for union springs from its hunger for elec­trons, which it will hap­pi­ly share with oth­er ele­ments in mol­e­c­u­lar marriage.

For exam­ple, oxy­gen will com­bine with two hydro­gen atoms to form water, that gushy sub­stance so essen­tial to life. Only a few weeks ago water was dis­cov­ered in a mete­orite, sug­gest­ing that wet­ness might be deli­cious­ly primeval.

Oxy­gen also throws in its lot with sil­i­con and alu­minum to form the rocks that make up the Earth­’s crust. It con­sti­tutes 35 per­cent of our entire plan­et by weight, more than any oth­er ele­ment. When grav­i­ty was pulling the Earth togeth­er out of the dust and gas of the pre-solar neb­u­la, it was oxy­gen that did much of the “heavy lift­ing,” drag­ging its com­pan­ion ele­ments into plan­e­tary sphericity.

Car­bon achieved great­ness. Of the mate­ri­als of the Earth­’s sur­face it amounts to a mere drop in the buck­et, a few hun­dredths of a per­cent. Who would have pre­dict­ed 4 bil­lion years ago that car­bon would be the basis for life and intel­li­gence, and ulti­mate­ly the trans­for­ma­tion of the planet?

Unlike oxy­gen, shy car­bon is ret­i­cent in mak­ing alliances, con­tent­ed­ly inclined to mind the advice of Shake­speare’s Polo­nius: “Nei­ther a bor­row­er or a lender (of elec­trons) be.” It resides hap­pi­ly in exclu­sive affil­i­a­tion with oth­er car­bon atoms, in unions as hard as dia­mond or as soft as graphite. When it does throw in its lot with oth­er ele­ments, the mar­riages are like­ly to be interesting.

The chem­istry of no oth­er ele­ment is as sub­tle and var­i­ous as the alliances of car­bon. Entire cours­es at uni­ver­si­ties — organ­ic chem­istry — con­sid­er noth­ing else. At the heart of every organ­ic mol­e­cule is a car­bon back­bone, a chain or ring of car­bon atoms that rep­re­sents that ele­men­t’s nar­cis­sis­tic affin­i­ty for its own kind.

Organ­ic mol­e­cules tend to have low melt­ing and boil­ing points, and there­fore usu­al­ly exist as liq­uids or gas­es at the tem­per­a­tures of the Earth­’s sur­face. Some­time more than 3 bil­lion years ago, com­pounds of car­bon, stew­ing in the soft enve­lope of the ear­ly Earth, found the means to self-cat­alyze their pro­duc­tion — and life made its appear­ance on the planet.

All ter­res­tri­al life is car­bon based, and life trumps the inor­gan­ic. Reluc­tant car­bon was the tor­toise to oxy­gen’s hare.

Sil­i­con is car­bon’s hefti­er cousin, resid­ing just below it in the peri­od­ic table and shar­ing car­bon’s chem­i­cal affini­ties. One might think that it would also share car­bon’s sub­tle and pro­lif­ic chem­istry; indeed, some folks have spec­u­lat­ed that oth­er plan­ets might har­bor sil­i­con-based life. But car­bon’s lighter weight makes its com­pounds more reac­tive at the tem­per­a­tures of the Earth­’s sur­face. Sil­i­con is heav­ier, and its com­pounds achieve the same degree of reac­tiv­i­ty only at hot sub­ter­ranean depths. At Earth­’s sur­face they are as inert as sand.

Cer­tain­ly, there’s plen­ty of sil­i­con about, vast­ly more than car­bon. About a quar­ter of the Earth­’s sur­face rocks are sil­i­con by weight. Sand is most­ly sil­i­con diox­ide, and what could be cheap­er and more plen­ti­ful than sand. But for all of its promise, and all of its plen­ty, sil­i­con nev­er achieved the great­ness of carbon.

Until it had great­ness thrust upon it.

Sil­i­con has elec­tri­cal prop­er­ties that make it a won­der­ful sub­strate for com­put­er cir­cuits. Its abil­i­ty to con­duct elec­tric­i­ty can eas­i­ly be mod­i­fied by adding impu­ri­ties to pure sil­i­con crys­tals. Sil­i­con oxide, which forms on the sur­face of sil­i­con when exposed to oxy­gen at high tem­per­a­ture — a kind of sil­i­con “rust” — is a fine insu­la­tor. All of which makes it rel­a­tive­ly easy to fab­ri­cate elec­tri­cal cir­cuits in sil­i­con on a micro­scop­ic scale.

Car­bon, in the form of intel­li­gent life, extract­ed sil­i­con from the rocks and helped it achieve its poten­tial as — the sil­i­con chip.

Of course, life has lift­ed oth­er ele­ments from obscu­ri­ty. What would mod­ern civ­i­liza­tion be with­out arti­facts of iron and alu­minum, for exam­ple. But sil­i­con’s rise to promi­nence incor­po­rates some of the sub­tle­ty of its car­bon cousin. A micro­com­put­er chip the size of a thumb­nail is more com­plex than, say, the Eif­fel Tow­er or the Titan­ic. The day may come when sil­i­con-based think­ing machines sur­pass the intel­li­gence of our own car­bon-based brains.

And because sil­i­con is less reac­tive than car­bon, com­put­er chips have a kind of sta­bil­i­ty, and — dare I say it? — immor­tal­i­ty that our car­bon-based brains lack. A few hun­dred years down the line, when com­put­ers rule the roost, clunky sil­i­con will have trumped sup­ple car­bon, by patient­ly play­ing a wait­ing game and fol­low­ing Polo­nius’s oth­er bit of advice: “To thy own self be true.”

Share this Musing: