To the microbes, we’re all shmoos

To the microbes, we’re all shmoos

Photo by CDC on Unsplash

Originally published 11 December 1995

Remem­ber the shmoo?

The shmoo was invent­ed by Al Capp in the com­ic strip Li’l Abn­er: a wob­bly ten­pin-with-legs sort of crea­ture with the mis­for­tune (or good for­tune) of being almost total­ly con­sum­able. Broiled shmoo tast­ed like steak; fried, like chick­en. Shmoos gave eggs, but­ter, and Grade A milk. The skin was a ver­sa­tile fab­ric, the eyes made per­fect but­tons, and even the whiskers served as tooth­picks. Most impor­tant­ly, shmoos repro­duced in prodi­gious num­bers and deliv­ered them­selves will­ing­ly to human appetites. If you looked hun­gri­ly at a shmoo it dropped dead of sheer happiness.

Shmoos were cute, shmoos were adorable. Shmoos were also irre­sistible blobs of pro­tein. It was inevitable that some­one would eat them.

Now, think about it anoth­er way. Humans repro­duce with shmoo-like aban­don. Nev­er in the his­to­ry of the plan­et has a sin­gle species mul­ti­plied with so few con­straints. There are present­ly near­ly 6 bil­lion of us, and our num­bers are soar­ing. We lev­el forests, fill bays, drain wet­lands, and pave over prairies to con­tain our bur­geon­ing prog­e­ny. We have made our­selves the shmoos of the plan­et — irre­sistible foodstuffs.

Zool­o­gist Mark Rid­ley writes: “Just as we con­sume resources, so we are our­selves a resource to be con­sumed. So far, we mere­ly hap­pen to be extra­or­di­nar­i­ly under­ex­ploit­ed… There is no eco­log­i­cal oppor­tu­ni­ty on the Earth to com­pare with the gigacaloric poten­tial of human flesh.”

In oth­er words, we are a meal wait­ing to happen.

But who will eat us? We are at the top of the food chain, more or less. The few man-eat­ing preda­tors on the plan­et can be held at bay with high-tech weapon­ry; indeed, as our own num­bers increase, sharks, lions, and tigers are pushed towards extinc­tion. What about extrater­res­tri­als? Might we become the grub of some more advanced galac­tic race? Maybe, but the pos­si­bil­i­ty is too remote to bear wor­ry­ing about.

The eaters who are wait­ing to con­sume us are clos­er to home, and poised to esca­late their ter­ri­ble assault. They are, of course, of the vast invis­i­ble com­mu­ni­ties of virus­es and bacteria.

With every bite of food we eat, we con­vert more of the avail­able plan­e­tary resources into human flesh. Increas­ing­ly, we must look like shmoos to the microbes: plump, avail­able, irre­sistible. Rid­ley draws atten­tion to the Dar­win­ian pres­sure on microbes to make their diet out of us. So far, they have made only lim­it­ed evo­lu­tion­ary progress towards over­whelm­ing our defens­es, but the dynam­ic of evo­lu­tion is on their side.

Not to wor­ry, you say. We have man­aged to keep lions and tigers at bay, we can do the same for microbes. Haven’t we invent­ed antibi­otics that will do the trick? Sure­ly, no micro­scop­ic organ­ism can com­pete with human genius.

Well, don’t be too sure. The sto­ry is more com­pli­cat­ed than that. For one thing, it was­n’t human genius that invent­ed antibi­otics. Peni­cillin and its allies were evolved by fun­gus­es and molds as defens­es against bac­te­ria. Humans dis­cov­ered antibi­otics when a peni­cillin-mak­ing mold acci­den­tal­ly fell into a dish of bac­te­ria in the lab­o­ra­to­ry of Alexan­der Flem­ing in 1928.

In oth­er words, our famous “mir­a­cle drugs” are prod­ucts of mil­lions of years of evo­lu­tion­ary tri­al and error. What humans have done is steal them from molds and fun­gus­es and use them against our own micro­bial ene­mies. Unfor­tu­nate­ly, we have used these pre­cious weapons with­out restraint, plac­ing a strong selec­tive pres­sure on microbes to evolve resis­tance to the drugs — and of course they have done so. The effec­tive­ness of antibi­otics is fad­ing fast.

The blame for this sor­ry state of affairs can be shared by drug com­pa­nies for greed­i­ly hawk­ing each new antibi­ot­ic, by doc­tors for friv­o­lous­ly pre­scrib­ing them, by patients for insist­ing upon the pre­scrip­tions, and by agribusi­ness for spik­ing live­stock feed with drugs.

Score a big one for the microbes.

Microbes have dom­i­nat­ed the plan­et for near­ly 4 bil­lion years; the rest of us are fair­ly recent arrivals. Some would say that microbes still own the plan­et, and mere­ly tol­er­ate the so-called “high­er” ani­mals and plants as long as it suits their purpose.

The most impor­tant les­son the human species can learn is that we are part of a bal­ance. The black death of the Mid­dle Ages, the influen­za epi­demics of the ear­ly 20th cen­tu­ry and the AIDS scourge of our own time are reminders of what can hap­pen when the bal­ance is bro­ken. The old myth of our god-giv­en domin­ion on the plan­et is not only out-of-date, it is down­right dangerous.

As the human pop­u­la­tion explo­sion increas­ing­ly turns the bio­mass of the plan­et into human flesh, the ancient bal­ance between our­selves and the microbes is put at risk. A show­down may be in the off­ing. The microbes have the advan­tage of short repro­duc­tion cycles, a mil­lion times faster than our own: In any race to evolve defens­es against the ene­my, we haven’t a hope of com­pet­ing. Bac­te­ria can evolve resis­tance against antibi­otics with­in months or years. Our own nat­ur­al defense mech­a­nisms against bac­te­ria are the prod­ucts of mil­lions of years of evolution.

The declin­ing effec­tive­ness of our mir­a­cle drugs sug­gests that a per­ma­nent tech­ni­cal fix against micro­scop­ic pathogens may not be forth­com­ing. We are sit­ting ducks, an irre­sistible poten­tial feast, vic­tims of our own suc­cess and lack of restraint.

Good luck to the human shmoo.

Share this Musing: