Trip to the genome zoo

Trip to the genome zoo

More closely related to a chimpanzee than a shark • Photo by Jen Milius on Unsplash

Originally published 13 December 1999

Come with me to a zoo.

Not your usu­al zoo of ani­mals in cages and cor­rals. This zoo is dis­played on a fold-out chart in the 1999 annu­al genome issue of the jour­nal Sci­ence.

Down the poster-sized page in par­al­lel rows are gene maps of 20 mam­mals — human, chim­panzee, gib­bon, lemur, cat, mink, pan­da, horse, pig, dol­phin, cow, sheep, bat, rat, mouse, and oth­ers — col­or cod­ed to show cor­re­spon­dences with human genes.

Genes are car­ried on tan­gled strands of DNA, called chro­mo­somes. Humans have 23 pairs of chro­mo­somes. The num­ber of pairs in oth­er mam­mals ranges from 3 for the munt­jac, a small deer of south­east Asia, to 67 for the black rhi­noc­er­os. All mam­mals have between 70,000 and 100,000 genes, arranged in lin­ear order along their chromosomes.

So far, only 6,000 human genes have names and known func­tions, but that will quick­ly change. With­in a decade the human genome (com­plete gene set) will be as thor­ough­ly anno­tat­ed as the Bible, as will the genomes of some oth­er mam­mals on the chart.

No one is sure exact­ly when or where, but about 165 mil­lion years ago, pos­si­bly in Asia, a small rat­like crea­ture diverged from rep­tiles to start the mam­malian line. Recent­ly, pale­on­tol­o­gists in north­ern Chi­na found a beau­ti­ful­ly-pre­served fos­sil skele­ton of one of these ear­li­est mam­mal ancestors.

For 100 mil­lion years mam­mals remained diminu­tive, scam­per­ing about under the feet of dinosaurs, per­haps liv­ing bur­row­ing, noc­tur­nal lives for safe­ty, slow­ly evolv­ing. Then 65 mil­lion years ago a 10-mile-wide aster­oid slammed into the Earth, blast­ing a dust cloud into the atmos­phere that blocked out the sun for months or years. Tem­per­a­tures plum­met­ed, pho­to­syn­the­sis ceased. Dinosaurs and many oth­er species of plants and ani­mals became extinct.

Some mam­mals sur­vived, per­haps in deep bur­rows, and when the dust cleared they inher­it­ed an emp­tied world, and quick­ly evolved mul­ti­ple forms to fill vacant eco­log­i­cal niches.

Since the calami­ty, tens of thou­sands of mam­mal species have evolved and become extinct. Today, there are approx­i­mate­ly 4,700 species of mam­mals. Embed­ded in their genes is the sto­ry of their evo­lu­tion — suc­cess­ful adap­ta­tions, blind alleys, changed envi­ron­ments, migra­tions. Old genes, new genes, mod­i­fied genes, junk genes. A his­to­ry and fam­i­ly tree of mam­malian life.

We have known since Dar­win that all crea­tures are relat­ed by com­mon descent. For more than a cen­tu­ry, biol­o­gists have con­struct­ed hypo­thet­i­cal fam­i­ly trees based on anatom­i­cal dif­fer­ences that are vis­i­ble to the eye, per­haps aid­ed by the micro­scope. Even a casu­al glance would sug­gest that humans are more close­ly relat­ed to chim­panzees than to cows. It is less obvi­ous that dol­phins are more close­ly relat­ed to chimps than to sharks.

Now, with the advent of gene analy­sis, we have a new way of dis­cov­er­ing fam­i­ly rela­tion­ships. Not by observ­ing the ani­mals them­selves, but by look­ing at gene sequences arrayed along their chromosomes.

Imag­ine this exper­i­ment: Give the gene maps of the 20 mam­mals on the Sci­ence chart to a math­e­mati­cian, with­out iden­ti­fy­ing the species, and ask, “Which species are most close­ly relat­ed?” The math­e­mati­cian does a sta­tis­ti­cal analy­sis and comes up with a hypo­thet­i­cal fam­i­ly tree. Lo and behold, it is iden­ti­cal to the tra­di­tion­al tree based on anatom­i­cal likenesses.

For exam­ple, the genes tell us that a dol­phin and a cow are more close­ly relat­ed than a chimp and a rat, and that a cat and a horse are more close­ly relat­ed than a human and a bat. Some­where back about 15 mil­lion years ago the cow and the sheep shared a com­mon ances­tor. We must go back about 100 mil­lion years to find the com­mon ances­tor of human and bat. All of this from look­ing at a sequence of chem­i­cal units along the DNA, and mak­ing rea­son­able assump­tions about muta­tion rates.

When a mur­der sus­pect is iden­ti­fied both by wit­ness iden­ti­fi­ca­tion in a police line­up and by DNA analy­sis of a drop of blood, we can feel more con­fi­dent about putting him away for life. The same is true for the evo­lu­tion of life on Earth. When we read the same sto­ry writ large in the anato­my and writ small in the DNA, our con­fi­dence increas­es that the sto­ry is true.

There is anoth­er insight to be gained by our vis­it to the chro­mo­some zoo. A tra­di­tion­al zoo rein­forces our sense of sep­a­ra­tion from the ani­mals; after all, they are in the cages, and we are out­side. But with the chro­mo­some zoo on the chart from Sci­ence, our affin­i­ty with oth­er mam­mals is made appar­ent in the flow­ing scheme of col­ors — sim­i­lar genes scat­tered across our chromosomes.

Genes on cat chro­mo­some A1 are alike in struc­ture and func­tion to genes on human chro­mo­somes 5 and 13. Dol­phin chro­mo­some 7 is sim­i­lar to human chro­mo­some 11. The chro­mo­somes of humans and chimps match up almost one for one. And so on. Unim­ped­ed by bars or bar­ri­ers, we see that we are mem­bers of one func­tion­al fam­i­ly, shar­ing an ancient and ele­gant chem­istry of life.

Share this Musing: